1. What is the main idea of the paper? (you can get much information on this from the abstract and introduction)
Computer graphology needs to yeild results that are able to be comprehended by a human expert and to be plausible to a graphologist. It is called Dynamic Time Warping, this process
2. What experiment, if any, was performed?
3. Was the experiment (or, if one was not performed, the data presented) GS or BS? That is, was there a large sample size, a cause-and-effect relationship, etc.
4. What did the authors determine about forensic graphology?
5. Name at least five interesting facts from the paper that you think the rest of the class might appreciate.
Computer graphology needs to yeild results that are able to be comprehended by a human expert and to be plausible to a graphologist. It is called Dynamic Time Warping, this process
2. What experiment, if any, was performed?
3. Was the experiment (or, if one was not performed, the data presented) GS or BS? That is, was there a large sample size, a cause-and-effect relationship, etc.
4. What did the authors determine about forensic graphology?
5. Name at least five interesting facts from the paper that you think the rest of the class might appreciate.